|
|
Volume 8 Issue 2 May 2004 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reviews: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Volume 8 Issue 2 May
2004 A3 & Digital learning Objects:
The Potential Teaching & Learning Advantages of a Wireless Network Over the past 12 months there has been considerable debate as to the role of wireless technologies within school systems. The concept is a very tempting one; simply place a small grey box somewhere in a cupboard and a wireless card in each computer and students can go anywhere and be connected to the network, the printer, e-mail and the Internet without any wires or cables. Unfortunately reality is quite different with it’s maze of standards, issues of interoperability, conflict with everything from garage door opener's to smart devices, not to mention the cost. So despite these issues, has wireless technology nonetheless reached a point where it should be considered in a school scenario? This paper will hopefully assist you in the decision-making process by addressing the following issues.
If teachers were asked for the perfect "teaching and learning environment" they would probably specify that one of the key components would be access to rich teaching and learning resources (including information, management and communications systems) on demand, at any time, anywhere, any place. At present, access to rich teaching and learning resources relies on the placement of quite expensive, large footprint (they take up a lot of space) devices on the periphery of the classroom so that teachers and learners can individually plug into the network. Teaching is about nuance and unfortunately this configuration, where students are facing away from each other and the teacher, creates a very individualistic environment where much of the incoming information about the learning process via observed subtleties is lost to the teacher. Any time, Anywhere, Anyone A3 From both the teacher and the learner’s point of view the present information and communications infrastructure places severe limitations on all three major expectations: any time, anywhere, anyone. Wireless networks on the other hand allow for students to work in groups, on individual work, working locally, nationally and internationally, from any place within the school at any time that suits them, as long as they have a device that allows them to access the network. Coupled with the ability to place information into an online format quickly and easily via their Knowledge NET, they have immediate access to pre-prepared content created by the teacher, as well as the capacity to create their own content (that is representative of their learning) and to present this information to anyone, anywhere, any time. Several recent advances in technology have made this concept more possible now than it has been in the past. One of these developments is the arrival of the Centrino chip which means that laptop computers can be smaller, require far less power (meaning that battery life can now be extended to five hours plus) and the savings in weight could translate to affordable improvements in the ruggedness of the exterior and interior of the notebook. Thanks to the Centrino chip laptop/notebook computers are now far more portable, affordable and robust. The price of Centrino powered notebooks is of the order $US1100-$US1500. To suggest that all students have a notebook (however appealing) would be unrealistic in that such a situation would place a significant burden on the school both in terms of providing access to resources (whether these be e-mail, web or networked resources), and the infrastructure to maintain such a vast collection of notebooks. While a notebook may be a clever technology, it is not the perfect technology for all seasons, and there is still a place for other technologies such as texts, workbooks, posters . . . etc. Once again it is critical that we focus, not on the technology as such, but on making the technology as transparent as possible in order that teachers and students can focus on the teaching and learning processes. Given the limitations of the technologies we presently have available to us, and the limited funding that is granted to school systems, we would see the optimal number of notebooks/laptops for any given group of 25-30 students as being four or five Centrino powered machines. These machines would preferably sit in a docking station rather than the classroom, such that when the notebook was returned to the docking station it automatically slotted into a powered coupling that recharged the battery. Simple use of a locking bar across the front of the docking station would make security against theft of these notebooks/laptops very affordable. Students, using their own initiative or under instruction from the teacher, would select a notebook from the docking station and use it as required, returning it to the docking station when they had completed the set task. In a wireless environment the technology can be used as an individual tool while students simply work from where they sit, saving their material to their personal Knowledge NET, or working as a group and saving to the appropriate class page on their Knowledge NET. [Visual Language]-[Written Language]-[Oral Language] The one remaining and considerable challenge in this technological sphere is the inputting of information. Keyboards require typing skills at an age where the technology and the physical development of the child simply do not mesh well. Tablet computing may go some way to meeting this challenge, voice technology is certainly improving BUT the greatest improvement that we could make in terms of minimising this challenge is to refrain from requiring students to present vast amounts of written documentation. In some cases pages of written material may well be appropriate, but in many situations a more balanced [visual elements]-[written element] approach (as is reflected in the format of successful instructive web sites) would be preferable. Producers of information for presentation to/by students need increasingly to be aware that a good web page will have a considerable amount of information communicated visually. Once again this is a considerable departure from what we have historically expected from our students. The Knowledge NET environment decrees that material be saved in a web format, a practice that encourages students to achieve a more balanced written-visual result. All it takes now is for teachers to encourage this philosophy. In order to complete the triangle of visual-written-oral communication students should be encouraged to give to their peers an oral report on the information that they have produced in this balanced visual-written format. Assessment; incorporating all three elements (visual oral and written) then becomes realistic, as long as we accept the professional capabilities of our teachers to make judgments based on fixed criteria and then interpreted professionally by professionals. Teachers therefore should be reducing the amount of written work that needs to be marked while increasing the oral and visual language assessment components. Theoretically this should lead to a reduction in overall time spent on assessment, and consequently a more balanced assessment profile of the student. Considering that from now on, the format for most of the material presented to students will be increasingly web based, this revised format must surely have a more appropriate oral-written-visual balance. Therefore it follows that the formats that students present in, and which we assess, should reflect this change.
The Impact of Digital learning Object Repositories The other significant technological advance that teachers can capitalise on is the online availability of digital learning objects. We have been talking for some time about the evolution of these DLO databases and some are starting to take shape. We have included a list of some of the databases that can be accessed and the age range for which they are suitable. The quality of some of the elements on these databases is extraordinary. These repositories don't necessarily come complete as "digital learning objects" but they still provide a wide- ranging set of resources that can be used by teachers in building online units of work within a Knowledge NET environment. As these objects are online teachers only need to either 1. Create a link to an object which will in turn open within a Knowledge NET (eg. http://www.knowledge-networks.co.nz) 2. Copy and paste them into their Knowledge NET as part of an overall unit of work. Digital learning objects are very powerful objects that eliminate the need to reinvent the wheel, and allow teachers to create high-quality units of work that can be tailored to meet the individual needs of students. As these digital learning objects become more available and numerous it will become possible to write units of work at 2, 3 or 4 different levels, for each classroom with less effort than creating one single unit using today’s techniques. This means that the teaching that is happening in the classroom is more focused on the capability of students, and the work more appropriate to their needs, enhancing the potential for more effective learning. Most of the materials in the table below are copyright and/or royalty free. It should be noted that even though a Knowledge NET is an intranet and not available to the public it is still covered by normal copyright law. For more details on this please see the March issue of the teachers at work newsletter.
Comments and suggestions can be sent to
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
home
| newsletter
& sites | top 1000 sites | surfing
the web |
|